Experiences of breast cancer related lymphoedema and the use of
reflexology for managing swelling: A qualitative study
Authors Judith Whatley, Rachael Street, Sally Kay
Abstract
Background and purpose: An estimated 1 in 5 women surviving breast cancer will go on to develop breast cancer
related lymphoedema (BCRL). There is a gap in the literature capturing experiences of people living with BCRL
who use complementary therapies.
Materials and methods: Data were collected from 26 participants via a semi-structured interview. Questioning
centred around their personal experiences of living with lymphoedema, and their use of reflexology lymphatic
drainage.
Results: Four main themes emerged which comprised physical and psycho-social impacts of lymphoedema,
experiences of physical change, and the return of optimism. RLD treatment was considered pleasant and non
invasive, and the reduction in swelling helped with pain and mobility.
Conclusion: The main conclusion from this qualitative evaluation was that participants perceived benefit on
physical and psychological levels. Participation in the study appeared to help re-engagement with normal life.
Further research is needed to quantify the changes in these parameters.
Background and purpose: An estimated 1 in 5 women surviving breast cancer will go on to develop breast cancer
related lymphoedema (BCRL). There is a gap in the literature capturing experiences of people living with BCRL
who use complementary therapies.
Materials and methods: Data were collected from 26 participants via a semi-structured interview. Questioning
centred around their personal experiences of living with lymphoedema, and their use of reflexology lymphatic
drainage.
Results: Four main themes emerged which comprised physical and psycho-social impacts of lymphoedema,
experiences of physical change, and the return of optimism. RLD treatment was considered pleasant and non
invasive, and the reduction in swelling helped with pain and mobility.
Conclusion: The main conclusion from this qualitative evaluation was that participants perceived benefit on
physical and psychological levels. Participation in the study appeared to help re-engagement with normal life.
Further research is needed to quantify the changes in these parameters.
|
|
|
|